Get These Articles on Your Mail:

Delivered by FeedBurner




Why is 1 not a Prime Number?

Is 1 a Prime Number?


Friends, in one of the post where I have described ‘Prime’ and ‘Composite’ Numbers, one of the curious visitor have asked me a very logical question. I will quote that question for your reference –
Text from Previous post-

“Prime and Composite : Any integer which is divisible by 1 and itself only is called a prime number.
unquote

quote
N.B.: 1 is not a prime number.”

Question

Could you explaine what is the creteria thar excludes 1 from the list of prime numbers?
a) 1 is integer
b) 1 is divisible by 1 and itself (1)
Since anybody in the past has declared that 1 is not prime number, why we should follow this without thinking and contravene the general rule for prime numbers?
Is 1 as a figure is something which has come from the thin air. It is and always will be an integer. The criteria for 2 are the same – divisible by 1 and itself. And for all prime numbers.
Most probably the 1 is “guilty” because with 1 starts the series on numbers (natural, odd or prime). Suppose 2 was the beginning of the series. Should we ignore 2, because series starts with 2?

My Explanation-

1 can be rejected being a prime number because of the given reasons-

The “real” definition of a prime number is “a natural number that has exactly two distinct natural number divisors.” This definition can be considered little confusing for general masses. This in essence means ” Any integer which is divisible by 1 and itself only is called a prime number.”, which is easier to digest. The only problem is that if one uses that phrasing, the number 1 is a little grey zone case. “Well, it is divisible by 1, and it is divisible by itself,” you could think. “Isn’t it also a prime number then?”

No, not by the official definition, because it only has a single natural number divisor: 1. This is why the “exception” had to be made, that 1 is not a prime number.

In short: the definition as we know it is a simplification that doesn’t work completely – except if we specify that 1 is not included.

Is it really important whether 1 is or not a prime number?

It is indeed very crucial to make the distinction. If we consider 1 not to be a prime number, then any composite number (such as 20) can be written as a product of primes in only one way (here, 2*2*5), not counting different orders. However, if 1 were a prime number, there would be infinitely many ways! We could write 20 for example, as 2*2*5, or 1*2*2*5, or 1*1*1*1*1*2*2*5. Having only one way to write a number as a product of primes is very useful when doing math.

Friends if you have similar questions or doubts hunting you, please feel free to write us@ info@fireup.co.in or leave a comment on any post. “We will be Happy to Help You”

Popularity: unranked [?]

Related posts:

  1. Difference Between Natural Numbers and Whole Numbers
  2. Even, Odd, Prime and Composite Numbers
  3. Difference Between Rational and Irrational Numbers

4 Responses to “Why is 1 not a Prime Number?”

  1. Great post thanks, all the best!

  2. I am a regualar reader of your site and would just like to thank you.

  3. Preethi Anusha on February 4th, 2010 at 17:30

    This is a very useful information . Thanks to the person who raised this doubt and thanks to you too .
    The site is very impressive ( though i did not check it completely yet ). Its full of interesting things. I will add it to my favs . Great job .. keep going :)

    Pre Anu

  4. Thanks for the appreciation. We will try our best to meet your expectatations.

    Regards

Leave a Reply